Media Ethics and Professional Standards in Broadcasting in the Digital Era

Main Article Content

Florence Nuhu

Abstract

Broadcasting remains important for informing citizens, shaping public debate and supporting democratic accountability. Digital convergence, however, has changed how broadcast journalism is produced, distributed and assessed. This theoretical review examines how established ethical principles and professional standards are challenged by social media, misinformation, algorithmic distribution, live broadcasting and artificial intelligence (AI). It draws on a purposively selected body of scholarly publications, professional codes, regulatory instruments and institutional reports, analysed through qualitative document analysis and thematic synthesis. Five connected areas guide the discussion: accuracy, verification and trust; impartiality, framing and gatekeeping; editorial judgement in time-sensitive broadcasting; misinformation, algorithms and AI; and regulation, accountability and press freedom. The literature indicates broad agreement on accuracy, fairness, independence, public interest and harm minimisation, but less consistency in how these principles are applied across hybrid broadcast-digital environments. Social Responsibility Theory provides the principal interpretive framework, complemented by deontological, virtue-ethical and care-ethical perspectives. The review argues that the main contemporary difficulty is not the absence of ethical principles but the challenge of applying them consistently amid rapid circulation, automated systems and competing institutional pressures. It concludes that ethical broadcasting requires regularly reviewed professional codes, robust verification and correction procedures, transparent and proportionate accountability, meaningful human oversight of AI-assisted editorial processes, and safeguards for editorial independence and freedom of expression

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Media Ethics and Professional Standards in Broadcasting in the Digital Era. (2026). Taraba State University Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 6(1), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.83216/tsujcms.vol6no1.183

References

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1xcjws

Dierickx, L., Opdahl, A. L., Khan, S. A., Lindén, C.-G., & Guerrero Rojas, D. C. (2024). A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism. Ethics and Information Technology, 26, Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09801-6

Gutiérrez-Caneda, B., Lindén, C.-G., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Ethics and journalistic challenges in the age of artificial intelligence: Talking with professionals and experts. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article 1465178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1465178

Humayun, M. F., & Ferrucci, P. (2022). Understanding social media in journalism practice: A typology. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1502–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2086594

National Broadcasting Commission. (2020). Nigeria Broadcasting Code (6th ed., amended addendum). https://www.nbc.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/NBC-Brochure-6TH-EDITION-AMENDED-addendum.pdf

Nigeria Union of Journalists. (n.d.). Code of ethics for Nigerian journalists. https://nuj.org.ng/code-of-ethics-for-nigerian-journalists/

Ofcom. (2025, October 20). Section five: Due impartiality and due accuracy and undue prominence of views and opinions. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-standards/section-five-due-impartiality-accuracy

Osun, B. O. R., & Adeleye, D. B. (2025). Ethical dilemmas of newspaper organisations and the usage of social media for journalists in Lagos State. KOMUNIKE: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, 17(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v17i1.12837

Paik, S. (2025). Journalism ethics for the algorithmic era. Digital Journalism, 13(4), 696–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2200195

Plaisance, P. L. (2014). Media ethics: Key principles for responsible practice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Porlezza, C., & Schapals, A. K. (2024). AI ethics in journalism (studies): An evolving field between research and practice. Emerging Media, 2(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241288818

Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1963). Four theories of the press. University of Illinois Press.

Sonni, A. F., Hafied, H., Irwanto, I., & Latuheru, R. (2024). Digital newsroom transformation: A systematic review of the impact of artificial intelligence on journalistic practices, news narratives, and ethical challenges. Journalism and Media, 5(4), 1554–1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040097

Ward, S. J. A. (2019). Disrupting journalism ethics: Radical change on the frontier of digital media. Routledge.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.